Abductive Reasoning with Uncertainty∗
نویسنده
چکیده
Abductive reasoning in general describes the process of discovering hypotheses and rules that would entail a given conclusion. Abductive reasoning consists of assessing the likelihood that a specific hypothesis entails a given conclusion. Abductive reasoning based on probabilities is used in many disciplines, such as medical diagnostics, where medical test results combined with conditional probabilities are used to determine the likelihood of possible diseases. In this paper we focus on abductive reasoning in subjective logic. The advantage of our approach over a purely probabilistic approach is that degrees of ignorance can be explicitly included as input and during the analysis.
منابع مشابه
UEcho: A Model of Uncertainty Management in Human Abductive Reasoning
This paper explores the uncertainty aspects of human abductive reasoning. Echo, a model of abduction based on the Theory of Explanatory Coherence (Thagard, 1992a), captures many aspects of human abductive reasoning, but fails to sufficiently manage the uncertainty in abduction. In particular, Echo does not handle belief acquisition and dynamic belief revision, two essential components of human ...
متن کاملMulti-adjoint Abduction via Neural Nets
This paper discusses abductive reasoning, that is, reasoning in which explanatory hypotheses are formed and evaluated. Specifically, we present a neural net based development of abductive multi-adjoint reasoning, introduced in [4], where adaptations of the uncertainty factor in a knowledge base are carried out automatically so that a number of given observations can be adequately explained.
متن کاملProbabilistic Abduction using Markov Logic Networks
Abduction is inference to the best explanation of a given set of evidence. It is important for plan or intent recognition systems. Traditional approaches to abductive reasoning have either used first-order logic, which is unable to reason under uncertainty, or Bayesian networks, which can handle uncertainty using probabilities but cannot directly handle an unbounded number of related entities. ...
متن کاملRepresenting Incomplete Knowledge in Abductive Logic Programming
Recently, Gelfond and Lifschitz presented a formal language for representing incomplete knowledge on actions and states, and a sound translation from this language to extended logic programming. We present an alternative translation to abductive logic programming with integrity constraints and prove the sound-ness and completeness. In addition, we show how an abductive procedure can be used, no...
متن کاملProbabilistic Inference and Probabilistic Reasoning
Uncertainty enters into human reasoning and inference in at least two ways. It is reasonable to suppose that there will be roles for these distinct uses of uncertainty also in automated reasoning.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011